25uA at 1.5 Volts”
This paper is apparently intended as a theorethical framework explaining how that is possible.
If White has somehow managed to figure out zero point energy - a big if - this is absolutely huge.
Unfortunately my understanding of physics isn’t nearly at the level necessary to properly understand, or pick apart, the paper. Here is the abstract:
Paper in full:Abstract
We show that adding quadratic temporal dispersion to a dynamic-vacuum acoustic model yields a fully analytic, exactly isospectral mapping to the hydrogenic Coulomb problem. In the regime 𝜔=𝐷𝑞2with 𝐷=ℏ/(2𝑚eff), a proton-imprinted constitutive profile produces an inverse sound speed 1/𝑐2
𝑠(𝑟)=𝐴(𝜔)+𝐶(𝜔)/𝑟 and hence a time-harmonic operator (𝛻2+𝑘2
eff)that is Coulombic at each bound eigenfrequency. Separation of variables yields the exact hydrogenic eigenfunctions 𝑅𝑛ℓ(𝑟)𝑌𝑚
ℓ(𝜃,𝜙); the angular labels (ℓ,𝑚)emerge naturally from the Laplace-Beltrami spectrum on 𝕊2 via rotational symmetry and boundary conditions (as in standard quantum mechanics), while localization follows from 𝐴(𝜔𝑛)<0 in a reactive stop band consistent with causal, passive dispersion. While angular-momentum quantization follows directly from rotational symmetry and boundary conditions in standard quantum mechanics (consistent with Noether's theorem), here it emerges within a classical-like dispersive acoustic framework without introducing additional wave-mechanical postulates beyond symmetry and self-adjointness. This highlights dispersion's role in bridging a hydrodynamic description to quantumlike spectral structure. Identifying 𝑞𝑛≡𝜅𝑛 maps spatial scale to frequency, giving 𝜔𝑛=𝐷𝜅2
𝑛∝1/𝑛2 and reproducing the Rydberg ladder. Calibration to the reduced-mass Rydberg frequency (𝜔*=2𝜋𝑐𝑅𝐻) fixes 𝐷=ℏ/(2𝜇) and 𝑚eff=𝜇, with no free parameters. We determine the frequency dependence of 𝐴(𝜔𝑛) and 𝐶(𝜔𝑛)consistent with the underlying dispersive physics and demonstrate agreement with hydrogenic mode shapes and transition lines. The framework also predicts isotope shifts [𝜇→𝜇(𝑀)] and symmetry-respecting Stark/Zeeman analogues. Dispersion thus renders quantization an emergent consequence of symmetry, boundary conditions, and causal response in a dynamic vacuum.
https://journals.aps.org/prresearch/abs ... /l8y7-r3rm
If anyone here feels up to it, please comment on the paper, or in general.