OOC Thread
Re: OOC Thread
Think Berhanrd might now the date, when did the United Kingdom celebrate V Day.
Re: OOC Thread
Is there a fact file for the Su-27 FLANKER family?
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Re: OOC Thread
Did we ever agree on what the name of CVN-74 was?
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
-
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
- Location: Auberry, CA
Re: OOC Thread
As per Theodore's Naval information that was reposted, CVN-74 is America.
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
Re: OOC Thread
We did if i recall a entire discsion about CVN-74 name over at AT.com if i remember corectly.
So if CVN-74 is America, what is the America-class amphibious assault ship of OTL name then.Matt Wiser wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 3:17 am As per Theodore's Naval information that was reposted, CVN-74 is America.
Re: OOC Thread
Part of what drove him away was my own personal preference for staying as close to reality as possible within the scenario with regard to ship names…Matt Wiser wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 3:17 am As per Theodore's Naval information that was reposted, CVN-74 is America.
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Re: OOC Thread
Lets hope that does not happen here, but can we pick a name as i need to edit both photos and the US Navy thread.
Re: OOC Thread
I think we went with United States for either CVN-74 or CVN-75 (which was actually authorized and laid down under that name)….
Matt, could we possibly use either Saratoga, Kitty Hawk, or Coral Sea for CVN-74?
Matt, could we possibly use either Saratoga, Kitty Hawk, or Coral Sea for CVN-74?
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Re: OOC Thread
What about a World War III Naval Battle like Kamthatka, sounds strange but could be used for the America-class Ahp.
Re: OOC Thread
Use the name America for the LHA-6 class, as per IRL, and keep the traditional carrier names as carriers…
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
-
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
- Location: Auberry, CA
Re: OOC Thread
These are the carriers, both Nimitz and Independence-class ships (The latter is OTL's Ford Class): Gents, please keep in mind that two years ago, when this information was rediscovered and posted, I declared it canon. It was canon when it was originally posted way back when, if you'll recall.
Nimitz (CVN-68) - to retire 2022.
Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) - to retire 2025.
Carl Vinson (CVN-70)
Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) - commissioned 1986.
Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) - commissioned 1989.
George Washington (CVN-73) - commissioned 1992.
America (CVN-74) - commissioned 1995.
United States (CVN-75) - commissioned 1998.
Ronald Reagan (CVN-76) - commissioned 2001.
Midway (CVN-77) - commissioned 2004.
Intrepid (CVN-78) - commissioned 2007.
Kitty Hawk (CVN-79) - commissioned 2010.
Independence class (2+2)
The successor to the Nimitz class in production, two active and more planned.
Independence (CVN-80) - commissioned 2013.
Saratoga (CVN-81) - commissioned 2016.
Coral Sea (CVN-82) - under construction, for completion in 2019.
Enterprise (CVN-83) - under construction, for completion in 2022.
Hornet (CVN-84) - projected, for completion in 2025.
Nimitz (CVN-68) - to retire 2022.
Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) - to retire 2025.
Carl Vinson (CVN-70)
Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) - commissioned 1986.
Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) - commissioned 1989.
George Washington (CVN-73) - commissioned 1992.
America (CVN-74) - commissioned 1995.
United States (CVN-75) - commissioned 1998.
Ronald Reagan (CVN-76) - commissioned 2001.
Midway (CVN-77) - commissioned 2004.
Intrepid (CVN-78) - commissioned 2007.
Kitty Hawk (CVN-79) - commissioned 2010.
Independence class (2+2)
The successor to the Nimitz class in production, two active and more planned.
Independence (CVN-80) - commissioned 2013.
Saratoga (CVN-81) - commissioned 2016.
Coral Sea (CVN-82) - under construction, for completion in 2019.
Enterprise (CVN-83) - under construction, for completion in 2022.
Hornet (CVN-84) - projected, for completion in 2025.
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
-
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
- Location: Auberry, CA
Re: OOC Thread
And the postwar amphibs, not including the Wasps: these ships are the Tarawa replacements:
Oriskany (LHA-6) - commissioned 2005.
Tripoli (LHA-7) - commissioned 2007.
Shangri-La (LHA-8) - commissioned 2009.
Iwo Jima (LHA-9) - commissioned 2011.
Inchon (LHA-10) - commissioned 2013.
Tarawa (LHA-11) - commissioned 2015.
Belleau Wood (LHA-12) - commissioned 2017.
Oriskany (LHA-6) - commissioned 2005.
Tripoli (LHA-7) - commissioned 2007.
Shangri-La (LHA-8) - commissioned 2009.
Iwo Jima (LHA-9) - commissioned 2011.
Inchon (LHA-10) - commissioned 2013.
Tarawa (LHA-11) - commissioned 2015.
Belleau Wood (LHA-12) - commissioned 2017.
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
Re: OOC Thread
You Think we see at least 1 World War III battle name there among the World War I and II names.Matt Wiser wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:13 am And the postwar amphibs, not including the Wasps: these ships are the Tarawa replacements:
Oriskany (LHA-6) - commissioned 2005.
Tripoli (LHA-7) - commissioned 2007.
Shangri-La (LHA-8) - commissioned 2009.
Iwo Jima (LHA-9) - commissioned 2011.
Inchon (LHA-10) - commissioned 2013.
Tarawa (LHA-11) - commissioned 2015.
Belleau Wood (LHA-12) - commissioned 2017.
-
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 11:20 am
Re: OOC Thread
I'm not sure we would.
What were the major US Marine invasions of WWIII?
Iceland
Kola Peninsula raid
Gibraltar? Or was that a mostly Commonwealth invasion force?
Marine actions not involving an invasion -
Lubbock?
I'm sure there's more, but I can't remember them at this point. Someone else can fill in the blanks, I'm sure.
I'm not really sure that the invasions are really worthy of a ship name. How many of the land battles were of a great enough significance to earn a ship named after them?
Belushi TD
What were the major US Marine invasions of WWIII?
Iceland
Kola Peninsula raid
Gibraltar? Or was that a mostly Commonwealth invasion force?
Marine actions not involving an invasion -
Lubbock?
I'm sure there's more, but I can't remember them at this point. Someone else can fill in the blanks, I'm sure.
I'm not really sure that the invasions are really worthy of a ship name. How many of the land battles were of a great enough significance to earn a ship named after them?
Belushi TD
Re: OOC Thread
Didn’t I say not too long ago that there was a new carrier Intrepid?
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
- jemhouston
- Posts: 5005
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:38 am
Re: OOC Thread
Lubbock you had at least one Marine was awarded MOH.
Re: OOC Thread
The Marines are kind of small, so they're not going to be big leaders for battle names. But carriers are traditionally named for famous ships and battles of any service branch, witness Oriskany, Lake Champlain, Saratoga, Yorktown, Monterey, Bataan, etc. I could see Pueblo, Houston, Sabine, Casper, and North Platte being carrier names.Belushi TD wrote: ↑Fri Apr 11, 2025 12:24 pm I'm not sure we would.
What were the major US Marine invasions of WWIII?
Iceland
Kola Peninsula raid
Gibraltar? Or was that a mostly Commonwealth invasion force?
Marine actions not involving an invasion -
Lubbock?
I'm sure there's more, but I can't remember them at this point. Someone else can fill in the blanks, I'm sure.
I'm not really sure that the invasions are really worthy of a ship name. How many of the land battles were of a great enough significance to earn a ship named after them?
Belushi TD
Re: OOC Thread
Houston was a cruiser name in World War II.
Last edited by Wolfman on Sun Apr 13, 2025 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.
“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
-
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
- Location: Auberry, CA
Re: OOC Thread
Intrepid would be CVN-85. Nimitz will be CVN-86. Lead ship of an Improved Independence class. The wartime Houston was a 688-class sub.
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.