OOC Thread

Long and short stories from the 1984 movie
Lordroel
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Lordroel »

Think Berhanrd might now the date, when did the United Kingdom celebrate V Day.
Wolfman
Posts: 1015
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Wolfman »

Is there a fact file for the Su-27 FLANKER family?
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Poohbah
Posts: 3042
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 2:08 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Poohbah »

Lordroel wrote: Fri Feb 21, 2025 11:10 am Think Berhanrd might now the date, when did the United Kingdom celebrate V Day.
When Ivan packed it in up in Canada?
Wolfman
Posts: 1015
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Wolfman »

Did we ever agree on what the name of CVN-74 was?
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Matt Wiser
Posts: 1004
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
Location: Auberry, CA

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Matt Wiser »

As per Theodore's Naval information that was reposted, CVN-74 is America.
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
Lordroel
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Lordroel »

Wolfman wrote: Wed Apr 09, 2025 10:06 pm Did we ever agree on what the name of CVN-74 was?
We did if i recall a entire discsion about CVN-74 name over at AT.com if i remember corectly.

Matt Wiser wrote: Thu Apr 10, 2025 3:17 am As per Theodore's Naval information that was reposted, CVN-74 is America.
So if CVN-74 is America, what is the America-class amphibious assault ship of OTL name then.
Wolfman
Posts: 1015
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Wolfman »

Matt Wiser wrote: Thu Apr 10, 2025 3:17 am As per Theodore's Naval information that was reposted, CVN-74 is America.
Part of what drove him away was my own personal preference for staying as close to reality as possible within the scenario with regard to ship names…
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Lordroel
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Lordroel »

Wolfman wrote: Thu Apr 10, 2025 1:19 pm
Part of what drove him away was my own personal preference for staying as close to reality as possible within the scenario with regard to ship names…
Lets hope that does not happen here, but can we pick a name as i need to edit both photos and the US Navy thread.
Wolfman
Posts: 1015
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Wolfman »

I think we went with United States for either CVN-74 or CVN-75 (which was actually authorized and laid down under that name)….

Matt, could we possibly use either Saratoga, Kitty Hawk, or Coral Sea for CVN-74?
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Lordroel
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Lordroel »

Wolfman wrote: Thu Apr 10, 2025 4:05 pm I think we went with United States for either CVN-74 or CVN-75 (which was actually authorized and laid down under that name)….

Matt, could we possibly use either Saratoga, Kitty Hawk, or Coral Sea for CVN-74?
What about a World War III Naval Battle like Kamthatka, sounds strange but could be used for the America-class Ahp.
Wolfman
Posts: 1015
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Wolfman »

Use the name America for the LHA-6 class, as per IRL, and keep the traditional carrier names as carriers…
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Matt Wiser
Posts: 1004
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
Location: Auberry, CA

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Matt Wiser »

These are the carriers, both Nimitz and Independence-class ships (The latter is OTL's Ford Class): Gents, please keep in mind that two years ago, when this information was rediscovered and posted, I declared it canon. It was canon when it was originally posted way back when, if you'll recall.

Nimitz (CVN-68) - to retire 2022.
Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) - to retire 2025.
Carl Vinson (CVN-70)
Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) - commissioned 1986.
Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) - commissioned 1989.
George Washington (CVN-73) - commissioned 1992.
America (CVN-74) - commissioned 1995.
United States (CVN-75) - commissioned 1998.
Ronald Reagan (CVN-76) - commissioned 2001.
Midway (CVN-77) - commissioned 2004.
Intrepid (CVN-78) - commissioned 2007.
Kitty Hawk (CVN-79) - commissioned 2010.

Independence class (2+2)

The successor to the Nimitz class in production, two active and more planned.

Independence (CVN-80) - commissioned 2013.
Saratoga (CVN-81) - commissioned 2016.
Coral Sea (CVN-82) - under construction, for completion in 2019.
Enterprise (CVN-83) - under construction, for completion in 2022.
Hornet (CVN-84) - projected, for completion in 2025.
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
Matt Wiser
Posts: 1004
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
Location: Auberry, CA

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Matt Wiser »

And the postwar amphibs, not including the Wasps: these ships are the Tarawa replacements:

Oriskany (LHA-6) - commissioned 2005.
Tripoli (LHA-7) - commissioned 2007.
Shangri-La (LHA-8) - commissioned 2009.
Iwo Jima (LHA-9) - commissioned 2011.
Inchon (LHA-10) - commissioned 2013.
Tarawa (LHA-11) - commissioned 2015.
Belleau Wood (LHA-12) - commissioned 2017.
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
Lordroel
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Lordroel »

Matt Wiser wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:13 am And the postwar amphibs, not including the Wasps: these ships are the Tarawa replacements:

Oriskany (LHA-6) - commissioned 2005.
Tripoli (LHA-7) - commissioned 2007.
Shangri-La (LHA-8) - commissioned 2009.
Iwo Jima (LHA-9) - commissioned 2011.
Inchon (LHA-10) - commissioned 2013.
Tarawa (LHA-11) - commissioned 2015.
Belleau Wood (LHA-12) - commissioned 2017.
You Think we see at least 1 World War III battle name there among the World War I and II names.
Belushi TD
Posts: 1284
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 11:20 am

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Belushi TD »

I'm not sure we would.

What were the major US Marine invasions of WWIII?

Iceland
Kola Peninsula raid
Gibraltar? Or was that a mostly Commonwealth invasion force?

Marine actions not involving an invasion -

Lubbock?


I'm sure there's more, but I can't remember them at this point. Someone else can fill in the blanks, I'm sure.


I'm not really sure that the invasions are really worthy of a ship name. How many of the land battles were of a great enough significance to earn a ship named after them?

Belushi TD
Wolfman
Posts: 1015
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Wolfman »

Didn’t I say not too long ago that there was a new carrier Intrepid?
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
User avatar
jemhouston
Posts: 5005
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:38 am

Re: OOC Thread

Post by jemhouston »

Lubbock you had at least one Marine was awarded MOH.
Poohbah
Posts: 3042
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 2:08 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Poohbah »

Belushi TD wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 12:24 pm I'm not sure we would.

What were the major US Marine invasions of WWIII?

Iceland
Kola Peninsula raid
Gibraltar? Or was that a mostly Commonwealth invasion force?

Marine actions not involving an invasion -

Lubbock?


I'm sure there's more, but I can't remember them at this point. Someone else can fill in the blanks, I'm sure.


I'm not really sure that the invasions are really worthy of a ship name. How many of the land battles were of a great enough significance to earn a ship named after them?

Belushi TD
The Marines are kind of small, so they're not going to be big leaders for battle names. But carriers are traditionally named for famous ships and battles of any service branch, witness Oriskany, Lake Champlain, Saratoga, Yorktown, Monterey, Bataan, etc. I could see Pueblo, Houston, Sabine, Casper, and North Platte being carrier names.
Wolfman
Posts: 1015
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Wolfman »

Houston was a cruiser name in World War II.
Last edited by Wolfman on Sun Apr 13, 2025 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Matt Wiser
Posts: 1004
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
Location: Auberry, CA

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Matt Wiser »

Intrepid would be CVN-85. Nimitz will be CVN-86. Lead ship of an Improved Independence class. The wartime Houston was a 688-class sub.
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
Post Reply