Re: The Stuart = Supatra Conspiracy theory
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2025 4:30 pm
This doesn’t seem groundbreaking after 2 years, nor does it show skepticism to be a conspiracy theory.
It is possible that there was some Thai female who spoke to someone at some point; and it is possible that there was someone of some description in the Thai military in some role. I’m not altogether sure that the above offhand comment, replete with a type of written ‘pidgin Asian’ that doesn’t follow the claimed degree of specialisation, study and expertise, is quite a conclusive point.
The available evidence and indications on the role of females in the RTA in the 1980s doesn’t present a huge window. Putting together a career timeline doesn’t seem to really line up. Going from an office lady in ~ 1980 to a senior colonel in 2003 and thence a major general is the type of tale that, if even halfway true, would be documented somehow, and would have lead to some sort of media comment.
I don’t know conclusively what was the case here, but on the basis of what I posted up back in 2022 and 2023, I don’t believe that the conclusion with the least amount of unfounded/untestable assumptions is that everything was completely accurate and true. To use a legal image, this is far, far from anything that could amount to proof beyond reasonable doubt, but it lies somewhere between raising reasonable doubt and approaching the balance of probabilities.
It is possible that there was some Thai female who spoke to someone at some point; and it is possible that there was someone of some description in the Thai military in some role. I’m not altogether sure that the above offhand comment, replete with a type of written ‘pidgin Asian’ that doesn’t follow the claimed degree of specialisation, study and expertise, is quite a conclusive point.
The available evidence and indications on the role of females in the RTA in the 1980s doesn’t present a huge window. Putting together a career timeline doesn’t seem to really line up. Going from an office lady in ~ 1980 to a senior colonel in 2003 and thence a major general is the type of tale that, if even halfway true, would be documented somehow, and would have lead to some sort of media comment.
I don’t know conclusively what was the case here, but on the basis of what I posted up back in 2022 and 2023, I don’t believe that the conclusion with the least amount of unfounded/untestable assumptions is that everything was completely accurate and true. To use a legal image, this is far, far from anything that could amount to proof beyond reasonable doubt, but it lies somewhere between raising reasonable doubt and approaching the balance of probabilities.