Search found 495 matches
- Thu Jun 05, 2025 6:10 pm
- Forum: Space and Technology
- Topic: Artificial blood out of Japan
- Replies: 15
- Views: 347
Re: Artificial blood out of Japan
That doesn't answer the big question. What do vampires thing about the taste and mouthfeel of the artificial blood? Is it palatable, or like the sludge at the bottom of a Navy coffee maker? Would go three towns over to pick up a bottle, or just go down the village at the bottom of the hill for a fre...
- Wed Jun 04, 2025 2:44 pm
- Forum: The Fiction Page
- Topic: Bolide
- Replies: 48
- Views: 3264
Re: Bolide
What happens when two continents are attracted to each other, with one taking the lead?
That's clearly a case of subduction.

- Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:23 pm
- Forum: The Fiction Page
- Topic: Bolide
- Replies: 48
- Views: 3264
Re: More Bolide: Whatever happened to...
The 'Gibraltar Arc' was *inside* the Med. This pumice marked the very, very start of the Eastern Atlantic Margin's failure, incipient descent. Okay, it would take a million years or three to really get going, but... However, that, as they say, is another story... Advance planning is very important....
- Fri May 30, 2025 3:48 am
- Forum: Administration And Personnel
- Topic: What sections of the board aren't indexed?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 175
Re: What sections of the board aren't indexed?
That was done quite a few years ago on the old board, as the place had gotten rather heated at times and non-members were visiting to pick up pieces they could then quote out-of-context, or in-context, on other boards to show how degenerate and troglodytic we were here.
- Tue May 27, 2025 5:00 pm
- Forum: The Fiction Page
- Topic: Bolide
- Replies: 48
- Views: 3264
Re: Bolide
As expected, given their actions.
Now, I'm unsure of actual UK procedures. Would the PM have announced awards like this, or would it have come from the Monarchy? Is there a civil list of awards given through #10 and the rest of the Government, or are all of these basically Royal appointments?
Now, I'm unsure of actual UK procedures. Would the PM have announced awards like this, or would it have come from the Monarchy? Is there a civil list of awards given through #10 and the rest of the Government, or are all of these basically Royal appointments?
- Tue May 27, 2025 4:57 pm
- Forum: History and Warfare
- Topic: North Korean DDG launch
- Replies: 17
- Views: 864
Re: North Korean DDG launch
What the ever loving F&#K did they do to make the ship rotate in two dimensions during the launch? Forget to remove the stops in the middle or something? I've seen videos of a bunch of sideways launches because I like to see the idiots watching from the opposite shore get chased away by the wav...
- Thu May 22, 2025 1:11 am
- Forum: The Bar
- Topic: PSA for HK G3 owners
- Replies: 12
- Views: 927
Re: PSA for HK G3 owners
Forgotten Weapons just released a video looking at the AK4, showing the differences compared to the standard G3 if anyone is interested: https://youtu.be/n8C5CzYQgqQ Best part of it was a commenter there recognized the serial number as the one he had decades ago in Swedish service. It's pinned as o...
- Wed May 21, 2025 4:11 am
- Forum: The Fiction Page
- Topic: Bolide
- Replies: 48
- Views: 3264
Re: Bolide
Nicely told about the disaster recovery, albeit from a limited perspective. Our two main characters are seeing what's in front of them and how they are helping. Given the competent village, I would also expect that there is someone coordinating things behind the scenes. Sending runners in vehicles t...
- Tue May 20, 2025 10:36 pm
- Forum: Space and Technology
- Topic: Space Force official: Commercial satellites can do a lot more than we thought
- Replies: 9
- Views: 421
Re: Space Force official: Commercial satellites can do a lot more than we thought
The biggest difference is in the launch costs. If it takes $400 million to get a satellite to orbit, it better work the first time, every time, and it's worth building it for half a billion to make sure. If it costs $50 million to get to orbit, save some money, skip some of the redundancy, and spend...
- Thu May 15, 2025 6:29 pm
- Forum: History and Warfare
- Topic: Plotting out WWIII: It's Really HARD
- Replies: 62
- Views: 4212
Re: Plotting out WWIII: It's Really HARD
"Having a fleet of mobile missiles standing air-borne alert on a Mach 3 CARRIER aircraft would have struck fear......" :shock: :shock: :shock: Forget the bomber. I want to see how big a carrier they were building to make this possible. Although I would like to see the kind of missile a F-...
- Wed May 14, 2025 5:03 pm
- Forum: The Fiction Page
- Topic: Bolide
- Replies: 48
- Views: 3264
Re: Bolide
Oops, indeed. If something moved the generator off it's mountings, or just moved the mountings, then they were very lucky indeed. The most unbelievable part of the story was the kitten wrangling. Extracting three kitties from their preferred spots and getting them into a carrier in less than half an...
- Sun May 11, 2025 8:34 pm
- Forum: The Fiction Page
- Topic: Trying to remember a naval fiction we once had on the old old board
- Replies: 10
- Views: 638
Re: Trying to remember a naval fiction we once had on the old old board
Tarrantry on the old Navweaps board
- Sat May 10, 2025 2:43 pm
- Forum: Administration And Personnel
- Topic: Mobile phones frequently logging users out
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1133
Re: Mobile phones frequently logging users out
Not a problem here on Android.
- Sat May 10, 2025 3:59 am
- Forum: History and Warfare
- Topic: The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a ‘light tank’ that was too heavy
- Replies: 33
- Views: 2089
Re: The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a ‘light tank’ that was too heavy
It's the Alaska class of armored vehicles. And a M1 is air droppable. Once. I don’t think the M10 is intended to be air dropped by parachute, even if theoretically capable of it. I think the plan is to have the paratroopers secure an airhead and then fly these things in to expand the perimeter. So ...
- Sat May 10, 2025 12:37 am
- Forum: History and Warfare
- Topic: The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a ‘light tank’ that was too heavy
- Replies: 33
- Views: 2089
Re: The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a ‘light tank’ that was too heavy
It's the Alaska class of armored vehicles.
And a M1 is air droppable. Once.
And a M1 is air droppable. Once.
- Fri May 09, 2025 4:17 pm
- Forum: History and Warfare
- Topic: The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a ‘light tank’ that was too heavy
- Replies: 33
- Views: 2089
Re: The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a ‘light tank’ that was too heavy
I know that isn't true. One of the primary tenets of Soviet tank design from WWII onwards was to reduce the size of the tank to make armoring it cheaper and lighter. Now, there are obviously costs in ergonomics and Soviet tank crewmen having to be under a certain size. It doesn't work out that way....
- Thu May 08, 2025 4:11 pm
- Forum: History and Warfare
- Topic: The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a ‘light tank’ that was too heavy
- Replies: 33
- Views: 2089
- Thu May 08, 2025 4:10 pm
- Forum: History and Warfare
- Topic: The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a ‘light tank’ that was too heavy
- Replies: 33
- Views: 2089
Re: The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a ‘light tank’ that was too heavy
Not enough. The 105mm gun is too big for the desired weight. The amount of armor is too much for the desired weight. The extra crew person probably only accounts for around 500 lbs at most, and an autoloader would weight at least that much. What they needed to do is scale the gun down to something ...
- Wed May 07, 2025 10:16 pm
- Forum: History and Warfare
- Topic: The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a ‘light tank’ that was too heavy
- Replies: 33
- Views: 2089
Re: The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a ‘light tank’ that was too heavy
Make a s-tank but made of titanium. :D Actually this sort of the question I can in here to ask. How much weight could be saved if we dropped the turret and used an autoloader with only a 2-3 man crew? Which now that I think about it is basically an S-Tank. Not enough. The 105mm gun is too big for t...
- Mon May 05, 2025 5:39 pm
- Forum: History and Warfare
- Topic: The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a ‘light tank’ that was too heavy
- Replies: 33
- Views: 2089
Re: The Army cancels the M10 Booker, a ‘light tank’ that was too heavy
The thing should have been down selected at the detail design point. 38 tons is not just a little bust on the weight limits. According to Page 4-2 (176) of FM 4-20.116 (FM 10-516) Reference Data for Airdrop Platform Loads , the limit for both the C-5 and the C-17 is 60,000 lbs on one load platform. ...